Teacher Trainers’ and Curriculum Development Experts’ Perspectives on Information Technologies Curriculum in Teacher Education
![](https://ojsdergi.com/ojsicons/gor.png)
![](https://ojsdergi.com/ojsicons/pdf.png)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.39.1894Anahtar Kelimeler:
information technologies - curriculum evaluation- teacher trainer - pre-service teachers- bologna processÖzet
This mixed-method study had two purposes: (1) to explore the appropriateness of the learning outcomes of information technologies (IT) course curriculum in teacher education programs based on the opinions of curriculum development experts and (2) to evaluate the opinions of the academics about the adequacy of this curriculum. Curriculum development experts (n = 5) evaluated the learning outcomes of the IT course curriculum followed by the education faculties of 25 universities in Türkiye in terms of their qualitative relevance. We also obtained the opinions of 10 academics in these faculties for the evaluation of the IT course curriculum. To collect data, we used the “Qualitative Eligibility Form for Learning Outcomes” and “Evaluation Form for IT Curriculum”. We employed descriptive statistics in the analysis of quantitative data while qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. The results showed that most of the learning outcomes in the IT course curriculum were not sufficient for the criteria of formal spelling conformity, necessity, and encouragement of higher-order thinking. The academics’ perspectives revealed that course sessions and practical learning activities in the IT curriculum were not sufficient. They suggested that emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, Web 2.0/3.0 tools, robotics, coding, and augmented/virtual reality should be integrated into the curriculum. The implications for IT curriculum in teacher education programs and recommendations for future research were also discussed.
Referanslar
Altınkaynak, Ş., Uysal, H., Akman, B., & Durmuşoğlu, M. (2017). Investigation of teachers’ and instructors’ views on the implementation of the Bologna process in the Turkish education system: the case of Hacettepe University. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences. 43(43), 1-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maruaebd/issue/23602/251278
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
EQF (2022). European qualifications framework. https://www.myk.gov.tr/images/articles/AYC/pdf/AYC_Seviye_Tanimlayicilari_(tr).pdf
Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.
CoHE (1998). Faculty of education teacher training undergraduate programs. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/egitim-fakultesi-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari-mart-1998.pdf, 05/12/2022
CoHE (2007). Faculties of teacher training and education (1982-2007): Evaluation of teacher training at the university. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/ogretmen-yetistirme-ve-egitim-fakulteleri.pdf 05/12/2022
CoHE (2010). Council in higher education: Bologna process applications in 66 questions. https://uluslararasi.yok.gov.tr/Documents/yay%C4%B1nlar/yuksekogretimde_yeniden_yapilanma_66_soruda_bologna_2010.pdf 30/12/2021
CoHE (2011). Turkish higher education qualifications framework (NQF) basic area qualifications teacher training and educational sciences. https://epdad.org.tr/data/genel/pdf/Genel-8.pdf 06/01/2022
CoHE (2018). New teacher training degree programs. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari 05/12/2022
CoHE (2021). Yeni öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari 28.10.2021
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Çebi, A., Özdemir, T. B., Reisoğlu, İ., & Çolak, C. (2022). From digital competences to technology integration: Re-formation of pre-service teachers’ knowledge and understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101965
Çiftçi, S., Yayla, A., & Sağlam, A. (2021). Student, teacher and educational environments in the context of 21. century skills . RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 24, 718-734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863
Dahl, B., Lien, E., & Lindberg-Sand, Å. (2009). Conformity or confusion? Changing higher education grading scales as a part of the Bologna Process: the cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 39-79. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2009.020103
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Del Pozo Andrés, M. D. M. (2009). El proceso de Bolonia en las aulas universitarias: una perspectiva europea. Cuestiones Pedagógicas. Revista de Ciencias de La Educación, 19, 55-73. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132459839.pdf
European Commission. (2004). The future of education and citizenship policies: The Commission adopts guidelines for future programs after 2006. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_04_315
European Commission. (2015). ECTS users’ guide. Publications Office, LU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/ education/ects/users-guide/docs/ects-users-guide_en.pdf.
European Commission. (2020). The European higher education area in 2020 bologna process implementation Report. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/european-higher-education-area-2020-bologna-process-implementation-report_en
European Higher Education Area. (1999). Bologna declaration of 19 June 1999: Joint declaration of the European ministers of education. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Ministerial_conferences/02/8/1999_Bologna_Declaration_English_553028.pdf
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Farjon D, Smits A., & Voogt J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers& Education, 130,81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 international report (p. 297). Springer Nature.
Grossman, G. M., Sands, M. K., & Brittingham, B. (2010). Teacher education accreditation in Turkey: The creation of a culture of quality. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 102-109.
Glutsch, N., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ achievement goals and achievement motivation at the beginning of their studies—a profile analysis. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 23, 793-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-020-00961-x
Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
Haseski, H. İ. (2019). Information technologies course: An evaluation from the perspective of pre-service teachers. Trakya Journal of Education, 9(4), 666-679. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.494705
Hendrik, H., & Hamzah, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in programming course: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(2), 220-236. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i02.15229
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149
Ibrahim, W., Ibrahim, W., Zoubeidi, T., Marzouk, S., Sweedan, A., & Amer, H. (2022). An online management system for streamlining and enhancing the quality of learning outcomes assessment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11325-11353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10918-8
Instefjord, E., & Munthe, E. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: An analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1100602
ISTE (2022). ISTE standards: Educator. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers
Jung, J., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2020). Course-level modeling of preservice teacher learning of technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12840
Kazu, İ. Y., & Çam, H. (2019). Review of postgraduate studies on teacher competence and qualifications: a content analysis study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 18(71), 1349-1367. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.516910
Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes, a practical guide. EUA Bologna Handbook. Making Bologna Work. Berlin: European University Association.
Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7- 01WB- BKHL- QDYV
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2014). Introducing TPCK. In Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 13-40). Routledge.
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice. 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Kroher, M., Leuze, K., Thomsen, S. L., & Trunzer, J. (2021). Did the "Bologna Process" achieve its goals? 20 years of empirical evidence on student enrolment, study success and labour market outcomes. IZA Discussion Papers.14757, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/250418
Kurent, B., & Avsec, S. (2023). Examining pre-service teachers regulation in distance and traditional preschool design and technology education. Heliyon. 9(2), e13738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13738
Maher, A. (2004). Learning outcomes in higher education: Implications for curriculum design and student learning. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 3(2), 46–54. https://l24.im/Gcm15
Marcelo, C. & Yot-Domínguez, C., (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 43(7), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
Martin, B. (2018). Faculty technology beliefs and practices in teacher preparation through a TPACK lens. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1775-1788. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10639-017-9680-4.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Nelson, M. J., & Voithofer, R. (2022). Coursework, field experiences, and the technology beliefs and practices of preservice teachers. Computers & Education, 186, 104547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104547
Núñez-Canal, M., de Obesso, M. D. L. M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270
OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf.
Parra-González, M. E., López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2021). Gamification and flipped learning and their influence on aspects related to the teaching-learning process. Heliyon, 7(2), e06254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06254
Pattanaphanchai, J. (2019). An investigation of students’ learning achievement and perception using flipped classroom in an introductory programming course: A case study of Thailand higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.5.4
Pedregosa, J. V. (2021). Program accreditation and preparedness of the pre-service teachers. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 109-118. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/12926/6663
Penbek, Ş., Zaptçıoğlu, D., & Günerergin, M. (2011). The need of effective strategic management during a planned change: An example of bologna change process from a Turkish university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 649-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.071
Pereira, E. T., Vilas-Boas, M., & Rebelo, C. F. (2020). University curricula and employability: The stakeholders’ views for a future agenda. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/095042222090167
Pozas, M., & Letzel, V. (2021). Do you think you have what it takes?–exploring predictors of pre-service teachers’ prospective ICT use. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 823-841, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09551-0
Qian, Y., Vaddiraju, S., & Khan, F. (2023). Safety education 4.0–A critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum. Safety Science, 161, 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106069
Raible, J., Bennett, L., & Bastedo, K. (2016). Writing measurable learning objectives to aid successful online course development. International Journal for the Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 112-122. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=IrOq7bgAAAAJ&citation_for_view=IrOq7bgAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. In Y. Punie (Ed), Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Joint Research Centre (No. JRC107466). https://doi.org/10.2760/159770.
Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2021). Development of prospective preschool and primary school teachers in the area of ICT use in education. E-mentor, 3(90), 32-42. https://rebus.us.edu.pl/bitstream/20.500.12128/21198/1/Smyrnova_Trybulska_development_of_prospective_preschool.pdf
Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
Şahin, A. (2021). The examination of digital literacy levels and attitudes towards e-learning of religious culture and moral knowledge pre-service teachers. Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches, 10(4), 3496-3525. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.937532
Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and teacher Education, 79, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
Tondeur, J., Braak, J., Sang , G., Voogt,J., Fisser,P & Ottenbreit-Leftwich A. (2012).Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
Tondeur, J., Howard, S. K., & Yang, J. (2021). One-size does not fit all: Towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659.
TQF (2023). History. https://tyc.gov.tr/sayfa/tarihce-i0bd96402-7e30-40b7-ac45-375233324bfd.html
UNESCO (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 20.03.2023
Wang, Q., & Zhao, G. (2021). ICT self‐efficacy mediates most effects of university ICT support on preservice teachers' TPACK: Evidence from three normal universities in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2319-2339. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13141
Wächter, B. (2004). The bologna process: Developments and prospects. European Journal of Education, 39(3), 265-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1503854
Yang, J. L., & McKenzie, S. (2018). Using career development learning in science and information technology courses to build 21st-century learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 3(66), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1525789
Yeşildağ, F. H., & Önlü, Ö. B., (2020). Reflection of science teacher candidates’ information technologies trainin on 5E course plan applications. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 10(2), 427-451. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.667304
Zahavi, H., & Friedman, Y. (2019). The Bologna Process: An international higher education regime. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1561314
Zhang, W., Zheng, J., Wang, J., Dong, J., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Design and implementation of the interdisciplinary curriculum for intelligent chemical engineering program at Taiyuan University of Technology. Education for Chemical Engineers, 42, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.10.002
Zimmer, W. K., & Matthews, S. D. (2022). A virtual coaching model of professional development to increase teachers' digital learning competencies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103544
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.