The views of Academic Staff on the Transition to Emergency Distance Education in the Pandemic Process
Abstract views: 483
/ 
PDF downloads: 364
/ PDF downloads: 406
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.32.1703Keywords:
Distance education, pandemic, academiciansAbstract
Education and training are constantly renewed in line with the changing world and emerging new learning needs. During the pandemic process in the world, the transition to distance education became essential at all grades of education. Many academicians started to use this system for the first time. The main subjects of this study are the effect of increasing technology usage times in the transition to compulsory distance education transition and the problems that may be encountered in distance education. From this point of view, the study aims to reveal the views of academic staff on compulsory distance education. This study used a case study, and the opinions of 20 lecturers working at Erzurum Ataturk University were collected with a semi-structured interview form. The obtained data were analyzed by creating themes and sub-themes through content analysis. In the light of the negotiations, difficulties in the planning and implementation of education, the difficulties in technological infrastructure problems, the advantages of distance education, and the situations created by technology in the distance education process were revealed. In light of the findings, it can be advised that all academics receive training on university distant education techniques.
References
Akdemir, O. (2011). Yuksekogretimimizde uzaktan egitim. Yuksekogretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(2), 69-71.
Balaban, E. (2012). Dunyada ve Turkiye’de uzaktan egitim ve bir proje onerisi. Istanbul: Isik Universitesi.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐ 19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115.
Bian, M. & Leung, L. (2015). Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 61-79.
Brown, C. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. Retrieved From. Erisim: https://www.eztalks.com/elearning/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-distance-learning.html
Cengizhan, C. (2005). Ogrencilerin bilgisayar ve internet kullanımında yeni bir boyut: İnternet bagımlılıgı, M.U. Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Yil: 2005, Sayı 22, 83-98
Choi, S. W., Kim, D. J., Choi, J. S., Ahn, H., Choi, E. J., Song, W. Y., Kim, S. & Youn, H. (2015). Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and Internet addiction, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 308-314.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
Coose, C. S. (2010). Distance nursing education in Alaska: A longitudinal study. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 93-96.
Cam, E. ve Isbulan, O. (2012). A new addiction for teacher candidates: Social networks. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 14-19.
Cavus, S., Ayhan, B., & Tuncer, M. (2016). Bilgisayar oyunları ve bagımlılık: Universite ogrencileri uzerine bir alan arastırması. İletisim Kuram ve Arastırma Dergisi, (43). 266-289
Cini, Y. N. Teknoloji Bagımlılıgının Sebepleri Uzerine Bir Roman Analizi: “Postayla Gelen Deniz Kabugu”. Akademik Tarih ve Dusunce Dergisi, 6(2), 754-775.
de Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T. & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, (29), 139-152.
Demir, E. (2014). Uzaktan Egitime Genel Bir Bakıs. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science. Dumlupınar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (39).
Demir, S. & Karakus, M. (2015). Etik iklim ile ogretmen ve ogrencilerin guven ve motivasyon duzeyleri arasindaki iliski. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi Dergisi, 21(2), 183-212.
Demirer, V., Bozoglan & B., Sahin, I. (2013). Preservice teachers’ Internet addiction in terms of gender, Internet access, loneliness and life satisfaction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 56-63.
Dinc, M. (2015). Teknoloji bagimliligi ve genclik. Genclik Arastirmalari Dergisi, 3(3), 31-65.
Dogan, S. & Tatık, R. S. (2015). Marmara universitesi' ndeki uzaktan egitim uygulamasinin ogrenci gorusleriyle degerlendirilmesi. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 2(1), 247-261.
Dorrian, J., & Wache, D. (2009). Introduction of an online approach to flexible learning for on-campus and distance education students: Lessons learned and ways forward. Nurse Education Today, 29(2), 157-167.
Elhai, J. D., Dvorak, R. D., Levine, J. C. & Hall, B. J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of affective disorders, 207, 251-259.
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D. & Hall, B. J. (2017). Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 75-82.
Erturgut, R. (2008). İnternet Temelli Uzaktan Egitimin Orsutsel, Sosyal, Pedagojik ve Teknolojik Bilesenleri. International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 1(2).
Eygu, H. ve Karaman, S. (2013). A study on the satisfaction perceptions of the distance education students. Kirikkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 36-59.
Gok, B. (2011). Uzaktan egitimde gorev alan ogretim elemanlarının uzaktan egitim algısı. Yayimlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Universitesi, Bilisim Enstitusu.
Griffiths, M. (2000). Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously?. Addiction Research, 8(5), 413-418.
Gunuc, S. & Kayri, M. (2010). Turkiye’de internet bagimlilik profili ve internet bagimlilik olceginin gelistirilmesi: Gecerlik-guvenirlik calismasi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 39(39), 220-232.
Hall, J., Roman, C., Jovel-Arias, C. & Young, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers examine digital equity amidst schools’ COVID-19 responses. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 28(2), 435–442.
Haug, S., Castro, R. P., Kwon, M., Filler, A., Kowatsch, T. & Schaub, M. P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(4), 299-307.
Hawi, N. S. & Samaha, M. (2016). To excel or not to excel: Strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers ve Education, 98, 81-89.
Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y. & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 267-282.
Ilgaz, H. & Askar, P. (2009). Cevrimici uzaktan egitim ortaminda topluluk hissi olcegi gelistirme calismasi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 27-35.
Isık, U. (2007), Medya Bagimliligi Teorisi Dogrultusunda İnternet Kullaniminin Etkileri ve Internet Bagimliligi, Doktora Tezi, Konya
İsman, A., Uzaktan egitim, Pegem Yayincilik, 4.Baskı, 2011
Ishmael, K., Heiser, R. & Payne, J. (2020). Pandemic planning for distance learning: Scenarios and Considerations for PreK-12 Education Leaders. New America.
Jeong, S. H., Kim, H., Yum, J. Y. & Hwang, Y. (2016). What type of content are smartphone users addicted to?: SNS vs. games. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 10-17.
Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P. & Jacobs, S. (2020). Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102775.
Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci10060165
Karadag, E. ve Kilic, B. (2019). Ogretmen goruslerine gore ogrenciler arasinda teknoloji bagimliligi. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar, 11, 101-117.
Karaman, K. ve Kurtoglu, M. (2009). Ogretmen adaylarinin internet bagimliligi hakkindaki gorusleri. Akademik Bilisim, Sanliurfa, 641-650
Kaya, S. (2020). Uzaktan egitimde basarinin onkosullari. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
Kaya, S. (2021). The factors predicting students' participation in online english courses. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 91, 301-320.
Kızılok, G. E. & Ozok, H. I. (2021). Teachers’ views on stress and internet addiction due to cultural diferences. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 441-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per. 21.75.8.3
Koppelman, H. & Vranken, H. (2008). Experiences with a synchronous virtual classroom in distance education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(3), 194-198.
Kucukvardar, M. & Tingoy, O. (2018). Teknoloji bagimliliginin semptomlar temelinde incelenmesi. Iletisim ve Bilisim Teknolojileri, 9(35), 111-123
Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H. & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. Plus One, 8(12).
Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern distance learning technologies in higher education: Introduction problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1578.
Lin, Y. H., Lin, Y. C., Lee, Y. H., Lin, P. H., Lin, S. H., Chang, L. R.,Tseng, H.,Yen, L.Y., Yang, Y.H. & Kuo, T. B. (2015). Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 65, 139-145.
Lin, Y. H., Chang, L. R., Lee, Y. H., Tseng, H. W., Kuo, T. B. & Chen, S. H. (2014). Development and validation of the smartphone addiction ınventory (SPAI). Plus One, 9(6).
Lynch, M. (2020). E-learning during a global pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916683710
Maimela, E. M. & Samuel, M. O. (2016). Perception of performance management system by academic staff in an open distance learning higher education environment. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 1-11.
Meyer, S., Wohlers, S. & Marshall, B. (2014). Blended learning: student experiences. Rhetoric and Reality: Critical Perspectives on Educational Technology, 89-98.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Nagrale, P. (2013). Advantages and disadvantages of distance education. SureJob. Available online: https://surejob. in/advantages-anddisadvantages-of-distance-education. html. (19 Eylul 2020de erisildi).
Odabas, H. (2003). Internet tabanli uzaktan egitim ve bilgi ve belge yonetimi. Turk Kutuphaneciligi, 17(1), 22-36.
Odacı, H. & Celik, C. B. (2016). Does internet dependence affect young people's psycho-social status? Intrafamilial and social relations, impulse control, coping ability and body image. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 343-347.
Onuka, A. O. (2012). Distance learners’ time management and learning effectiveness. Time Management, 77-88.
Ozgen, K., Narli, S. & Alkan, H., Matematik ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ve teknoloji kullanim sikligi algilarinin incelenmesi, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences ISSN:1304-0278, Kis-2013 Cilt:12 Sayı:44 (031-051)
Ozgur, H. (2013). Analyzing the relationship between social networking addiction, interaction anxiousness and levels of loneliness of pre-service teachers Ogretmen adaylarinin sosyal ag bagimliligi, etkilesim kaygisi ve yalnizlik duzeyi arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 667-690.
Ozok, H. I. ve Aka, P. (2021). Pandemi nedeniyle evde kalan genc yetiskinlerin bilincli farkindalik ve stres kontrolu ile ilgili gorusleri. Turkish Studies- Education, 16(2), 1087-1104. https://dx.doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.48264
Panova, T. & Carbonell, X. (2018). Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 252-259.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). Sage.
Petrenko, L., Kravets, S., Bazeliuk, O., Maiboroda, L., & Muzyka, I. (2020). Analysis of the current state of distance learning in the vocational education and training institutions. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 166, p. 10010). EDP Sciences.
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88.
Samaha, M. & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325.
Savci, M. ve Aysan, F. (2017). Teknolojik bagimliliklar ve sosyal baglilik: İnternet bagimliligi, sosyal medya bagimliligi, dijital oyun bagimliligi ve akıllı telefon bagimliliginin sosyal bagliligi yordayici etkisi. Dusunen Adam, 30(3), 202-216.
Shaw, M. ve Black, DW (2008). İnternet bagımlılıgı. CNS ilacları, 22 (5), 353-365.
Song, I., Larose, R., Eastin, M. S. & Lin, C. A. (2004). Internet gratifications and Internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(4), 384-394.
Sozbilir, A. (2019), Acik hava etkinliklerinin dijital bagimlilik duzeyine etkisinin incelenmesi, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul
Sahin, M. C. ve Tekdal, M. (2005). İnternet tabanli uzaktan egitimin etkililigi: Bir meta-analiz calismasi. Akademik Bilisim, 02-04.
Sen, B., Atasoy, F. ve Aydın, N. (2010). Dusuk maliyetli web tabanlı uzaktan egitim sistemi uygulamasi. Akademik Bilisim, 10-12.
Tanhan, F. & Ozok, H.İ. (2020). Pandemi ve Egitim. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik. (ss. 145-158).
Titov, V. (2018). Distance learning of public and municipal officials ın the russian federation: needs and development problems. In Proceedings of the International Management Conference (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 322-326). Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.
Toker Gokce, A. (2008). Kuresellesme surecinde uzaktan egitim. Dicle Universitesi Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, (11), 1-12.
TUİK. (2019).https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2019-30574. Retrieved 25.03. from
TUİK. (2021). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim- Arastirmasi-2021-37437. Retrieved 15.03. from
Tuncer, M. ve Tanas, R. (2011). Akademisyenlerin Uzaktan Egitim Programlarina Yonelik Goruslerinin Degerlendirilmesi (Firat ve Tunceli Universiteleri Ornegi). İlkogretim Online, 10(2).
Turel, O., Serenko, A. ve Giles, P. (2011). Teknoloji bagimliligi ve kullanimini entegre etme: Cevrimici acik artirma kullanicilarinin ampirik bir arastirmasi. MIS Uc Ayda Bir, 1043-1061.
Ulusoy, K. (2017). Tarih ogretmenlerinin madde bagimliligi ve medya bagimliligi ile ilgili dusunceleri. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(1), 385-400
Usta, N. D., Durukan, U. G. ve Hacioglu, Y. (2016). Bilgisayar ve ogretim teknolojileri ogretmeni adaylarinin “teknoloji” algilari. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(7), 24-46.
Unver, G., Bumen, N. T. ve Basbay, M. (2010). Ortaogretim alan ogretmenligi tezsiz yuksek lisans derslerine ogretim elemani bakisi: Ege Universitesi ornegi. Egitim ve Bilim, 35(155).
Weinstein, A. & Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 277-283.
Whang, L. S. M., Lee, S. & Chang, G. (2003). Internet over-users' psychological profiles: a behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(2), 143-150.
Widyanto, L. & Griffiths, M. (2006). 'İnternet bagimliligi': elestirel bir inceleme. Uluslararasi Ruh Sagligi ve Bagimlilik Dergisi , 4 (1), 31-51.
Williams, T.K., McIntosh, R.W. & Russell, W.B. (2021). Equity in distance education during COVID-19. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.1
Yavuz, S. ve Coskun, E. A. (2008). Sinif ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin egitimde teknoloji kullanimina iliskin tutum ve dusunceleri. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 34(34), 276-286.
Yellowlees, P. M. & Marks, S. (2007). Problematic internet use or internet addiction?. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1447-1453.
Yildirim, A. ve Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
Yildirim, A. ve Simsek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri (8.baski). Seckin Yayincilik. Ankara
Yilmaz, G. K. ve Guven, B. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin uzaktan egitime yonelik algilarinin metaforlar yoluyla belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 299-322.
Yilmaz, H., Sakarya, G., Gayretli, S. ve Zahal, O. (2021). Covid-19 ve cevrimici muzik egitimi: okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarinin gorusleri uzerine nitel bir calisma. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 28, 283-299. doi: 10.14689/enad.28.12
Yilmaz, M., Uredi, L. ve Akbasli, S., (2015). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin bilgisayar yeterlilik duzeylerinin ve egitimde teknoloji kullanimina yonelik algilarinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararasi Beseri Bilimler ve Egitim Dergisi, 1(1), 105-121.
Yilmaz İnce, E., Kabul, A. ve Diler, İ. (2020). Distance education in higher education in the COVID-19 pandemic process: A case of Isparta Applied Sciences University. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 343-351.
Yilmazsoy, B. ve Kahraman, M. (2017). Uzaktan egitim ogrencilerinin internet bagimlilik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. Acik ogretim Uygulamalari ve Arastirmalari Dergisi, 3(4), 9-29.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet bagimliligi: Yeni bir klinik bozuklugun ortaya cikmasi. Siber Psikoloji ve Davranis , 1 (3), 237-244.
Young, KS & Rodgers, RC (1998). İnternet bagimliligi: Gelisimi ile iliskili kisilik ozellikleri, Dogu Psikoloji Dernegi'nin 69. yillik toplantisinda sunulan bildiri, CyberPsychology ve Behaviour, 1 (1), 25-28
Young, K. S. (1999). Internet addiction: Evaluation and treatment.Student. BMJ ; London Vol. 7, (Oct 1999).
Young, K. S. (1999). Internet addiction: symptoms, evaluation and treatment. Innovations in clinical practice: A source book, 17(17), 351-352.
Young, KS (2004). İnternet bagimliligi: Yeni bir klinik fenomen ve sonuclari. Amerikali davranis bilimci , 48 (4), 402-415.
Young, K. (2009). Internet addiction: diagnosis and treatment considerations. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 39(4), 241-246.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
