Management of Artistic Practice Pedagogies of Interdisciplinary Art Students With Critical Analysis Learning Method
Abstract views: 52
/ 
PDF downloads: 102
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.36.1809Keywords:
Art, Design, Art Education, Interdisciplinary Art, Jewelry DesignAbstract
This study aims to ensure that graduate students from plastic arts disciplines (sculpture, graphics, painting, ceramics) can develop their critical analysis skills through their jewelry design practices from the perspective of their own art disciplines. A group of 25 students participated in the study, which was planned for three hours a day, one day a week, for a total of 28 weeks during the autumn and spring semesters of 2021-2022. In the study, we conducted interviews with designers, artists, and academicians about their production processes. The participants in the study were given the opportunity to experience jewelry design projects in a digital environment by teaching and using the “Nomad Sculpt” software. The participants presented their own jewelry design projects with the criticism system developed by Feldman which consists of description, formal analysis, interpretation and judgement stages, and dialogues in which learning processes questioned with this research program were also included in the evaluation process. This process was evaluated with an analytical approach by a committee of faculty members involved in the project. The study aimed to explore and reveal the efficiency of the interdisciplinary working processes of the participating students across all artistic production stages, the awareness of the principles and elements of art, and the connections between artistic production and theoretical knowledge. Some of the results obtained from the study were that the participants who expected to improve their design skills met these expectations, and that the participants in the study were able to produce discourse on their artistic productions with the attainment of interdisciplinary work.
References
Adler, J. (1979). Artists in offices: An ethnography of an academic art scene. New Brunswick, NJ.
Alashari, D. (2021). The Significance of Feldman Method in Art Criticism and Art Education,
International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Vol. 25, Issue 02, ISSN: 1475-7192 877
Alsaggar, M., Tubaishat, T. (2021). “The Effect of a Proposed Program Based on Feldman's Method of Art Criticism in Art Education”. Sanat Dergisi, (37), 277-295. Doi: http://doi.org/10.47571/ataunigsfd.812701
Anderson, T. (1986). The Feldman Method of Art Criticism: Is it Adequate for the Socially Concerned Art Educator?, The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, Volume 6, 59-70.
Anderson, T., Milbrandt, M. (2005). Art for Life: Authentic Instruction in Art. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Androutsos, A., Brinia, V. (2019). Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Education Sciences, 9(2), 113. doi:10.3390/educsci9020113
Aydoğdu, Ü. R., Karamustafaoğlu, O., Bülbül, Ş. M. (2017). Akademik Araştırmalarda Araştırma Yöntemleri ile Örneklem İlişkisi: Doğrulayıcı Doküman Analizi Örneği. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 556-565
Barrett, T. (1988). A comparison of the goals of studio professors conducting critiques and art education goals for teaching criticism. Studies in Art Education, 30(1), 22- 27. doi: 10.2307/1320648
Barrett, T. (2020). Eleştiri, Çeviren: Manolya Aşık Öztürk, Hayalperest Yayınevi, İstanbul
Bennetts, C. (2004). The Flight of the Phoenix: Using Hermeneutics to Interpret the Role of the Mentor in the Creative Cycle. International Journal of Lifelong Education 23.4 367-83.
Bernabei, R. (2017). Wearable Words: A case study applying Jewellery theory and practice to the education of Fine Art, Textiles Innovation and Design, Graphic Communication and Illustration students, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, S1503-S1510, DOI:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352674
Cornock, S. (1984). Learning strategies in fine art. Journal of Art and Design Education, 3(2), 141-159. doi: 10.1111/j.14768070.1984.tb00111.x
Creswell, J.W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Creswell, J. (2013). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Çeviri Editörleri: Mesut Bütün ve Selçuk Beşir Demir), Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). The sage handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dinham, S. M. (1987). Dilemmas in architecture studio instruction: Research and theory about design teaching. Paper presented at the Western Regional Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Pomona, CA.
Ecker, D. W., Kaelin. E. F. (1972). The Limits of Aesthetic Inquiry: A Guide to Educational Research. Philosophical Redirection of Educational Research. 71st Yearbook for the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. 1. Ed. L. G. Thomas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 258-86.
Esser-Hall, G. (2000). Perpetual Beginnings: The Role of Phenomenological Hermeneutics in Art Education, The International Journal of Art & Design Education 19(3). 288–295.
Feldman, E. B. (1982). Varieties of visual experience. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Feldman, E. (1994). Practical art criticism. USA: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Feldman, E. (2001). Research as the Verification of Aesthetics." Aesthetics and Criticism in Art Education: Problems in Defining, Explaining, and Evaluating Art. Ed. R. Smith. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association, 56-61.
Ferraello, L. (2019). Social awareness in design & engineer education and practice. The value of ethics in postgraduate education. In E. Bohemia, A. Kovacevic, L. Buck, R. Brisco, D. Evans, H. Grierson, W. Ion, & R. I. Whitfield (Eds.), Towards a new innovation landscape. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), The Design Society, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Geahigan, G. (1983). Art criticism: An analysis of the concept. Visual Arts Research, 9(2), 10-22. doi: 10.2307/20715530
Greer, W. D. (1984). Discipline-based art education: Approaching art as a subject of study. Studies in Art Education, 25(4), 212-218. doi: 10.2307/1320414
Gürbüz, S., Şahin, F. (2018) Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hitchcock, G., Hughes. D. (1989). Research and the Teacher. New York: Routledge.
Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A., Lopez-Torres, L. (2003). Beyond Reflection: Teacher Learning as Praxis. Theory Into Practice 42.3: 248-54.
Jones, R. A. (2008). Developing high school students’ ability to write about their art through the use of art criticism practices in sketchbooks: A case study. (Unpublished master’s dissertation, The Ohio University, Athens).
Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
Laverty, S. (2003). Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35.
Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Mace, M. (1997). Toward an Understanding of Creativity Through a Qualitative Appraisal of Contemporary Art Making. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2/3): 265-278.
Madge, C., Weinberger, B. (1973). Art students observed. London: Faber and Faber.
Marshall, C. (2010). A Research Design for Studio-Based Research in Art, Teaching Artist Journal, 8(2), 77-87.
Medola, F., Pavel, N., Baleotti, L., Santos, A., Ferrari, A., Figliolia, A. (2021). Phenomenological Approach to Product Design Pedagogy: A Study on Students’ Experiences in Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Settings. Design And Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(2), 86-100.
Özkök, A. (2005). Dı̇sı̇plı̇nlerarası Yaklaşıma Dayalı Yaratıcı Problem Çözme Öğretim Programının Yaratıcı Problem Çözme Becerisine Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28: 159-167.
Öztütüncü, S. (2016). Disiplinlerarası Atölye Dersleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Akdeniz Sanat Dergisi, 9(19), 15-28.
Rosenberg, H. (1966). Criticism and its premises. Edward L. Mattil (Ed.), A seminar in art education for research and curriculum development. University Park Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED010000.pdf
Self, J. A., Evans, M., Jun, T., Southee, D. (2019). Interdisciplinary: Challenges and opportunities for design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 843–876. doi:10.1007/s10798-018-9460-5
Strauss, A., J. Corbin. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Subramaniam, M., Hanafi, J., Putih, A. T. (2016). Teaching for Art Criticism: Incorporating Feldman's Critical Analysis Learning Model in Students' Studio Practice, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1). 57-67.
Sullivan, G. (2004). Studio Art as Research Practice. Handbook of Research in Art Education. Ed. E. Eisner and M. Day. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 795-814.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in the Visual Arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thurber, F. (2004). Teacher Education as a Field of Study in Art Education: A Comprehensive Overview of Methodology and Methods Used in Research About Art Teacher Education. Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education. Eds. E. Eisner and M. D. Day. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 487-523.
Weber, R. (2003). The Reflexive Researcher, MIS Quarterly, 27(4), v-xiv. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036546
Yağar, F., Dökme, S. (2018). Niteliksel Araştirmalarin Planlanmasi: Araştirma Sorulari, Örneklem Seçimi, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik. Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (3), 1-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
