Those Who Have No Chains to Lose: Precarious Paid Teachers and Master Instructors
Abstract views: 608
/ 
PDF downloads: 502
/ PDF downloads: 529
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.31.1582Abstract
The term "precariat" refers to a group of employees who work in non-permanent jobs and do not have a steady source of income. According to the literature, the situation of paid teachers and master trainers working in public formal and non-formal education institutions was investigated in this study. The research was conducted with ten paid instructors and ten master instructors who worked for hourly salaries in Istanbul's schools and public education centers. The content analysis method, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used to conduct the research. The information was gathered using a semi-structured interview form and a face-to-face interview technique. As a result of the data analysis, it was found that paid teachers and master instructors acted as denizen citizens. Personnel and trade union rights were the most prominent themes among the participants. When the research findings are considered, it is possible to conclude that eliminating low-wage occupations and security concerns will increase the quality of paid teachers and master instructors, as well as the educational system as a whole.
References
Akin, K. & Duman, C. (2021). Normal emegin kirilganligi ve esitlenme: Eve sigmayan hayatlar ve pandemide seks iscileri belgesellerini prekarya uzerinden dusunmek. ViraVerita E-Dergi, (13), 209-234.
Akyel, E. (2021). Prekarya olmak: Anonim sirketlerde calisan orta sinif beyaz yakali sosyolojik bir analizi-İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir ornekleri. (Yayınlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi.
Atar, O. G. & Ulusoy, S. G. (2020). Gunumuzun modern teknolojik iscileri prekarya calisanlarin evliliklerinde aile iletisimi kavramina bakislari. Kurgu, 28(1), 194-215.
Beck, U. (2011). Risk toplumu: Başka bir modernlige dogru (K. Ozdogan & B., Dogan, Cev.). İthaki.
Bora, T. (2010). Tekel direnisinde ara son-sınıf mucadelesi: ‘hep’olan ve ‘yeni’olan. Birikim Dergisi, Erisim Adresi: https://birikimdergisi.com/dergiler/birikim/1/sayi-251-252-mart-nisan-2010/2429/tekel-direnisinde-ara-son-sinif-mucadelesi-hep-olan-ve-yeni-olan/6407 Erişim Tarihi, 13.01.2022.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Contre-feux: Propos pour servir à la résistance contre l’invasion néo- libérale. Raisons d’Agir.
Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, S. & Cakmak, E. K. (2011). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Pegem Akademi.
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Nitel arastirma yontemleri: Bes yaklasima gore nitel arastirma ve arastirma deseni, (Cev. Ed: Bütün, M. & Demir, S.B.). 5. Baskı. Siyasal Kitabevi.
Cerkezoglu, A. & Goztepe O (2010). “Sinifini arayan siyasetten siyasetini arayan sinifa: Güvencesizler”, Gokhan Bulut (Der.). Tekel Direnisinin Isiginda Gelenekselden Yeniye Isci Sinifi Hareketi. Nota Bene Yayinlari icinde, s.63-92.
Duda, M. D., Beppler, T., Austen, D. J., & Organ, J. F. (2022). The precarious position of wildlife conservation funding in the United States. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 27(2), 164-172.
Flick, U. (2014). An ıntroduction to qualitative research. Sage.
Giddens, A. (1994). Modernligin sonuclari (E. Kusdil, Cev.). Ayrinti Yayinlari.
Gray, B. J., Grey, C. N. B., Hookway, A., Homolova, L., & Davies, A. R. (2021). Differences in the impact of precarious employment on health across population subgroups: a scoping review. Perspectives in Publıc Health, 141(1), 37-49.
Gunerigok, M. & Ogur, K. (2018). Prekarya sosyolojisi: Ucretli ogretmenler ornegi. Din ve Bilim-Mus Alparslan Universitesi Islami Ilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 1(2), 138-156.
Jonsson, J., Matilla-Santander, N., Kreshpaj, B., Johansson, G., Kjellberg, K., Burström, B., ... & Bodin, T. (2021). Precarious employment and general, mental and physical health in Stockholm, Sweden: a cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49(2), 228-236.
Kalleberg, A. & Vallas, S. (2017). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work: C. 31. Precarious work: Causes, characteristics, and consequences içinde (ss. 1-30). https:// doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320170000031017
Karaoz, C. & Tandacgunes Kahraman, N. (2020). Sinif olgusu kapsaminda sinif bilinci ve ag toplumunda prekarya sinifinin katilimci kulturde temsili: “Ofissizler” platformu ozelinde freelance calisanlar uzerine bir arastirma. Ege Universitesi İletisim Fakultesi Yeni Dusunceler Hakemli E-Dergisi, (14), 88-1.
Kutlu, D. (2018). Sosyal Yardim Alanlar. Iletisim.
Lorey, I. (2011). Governmental precarization. https://transversal.at/transversal/0811/lorey/en Erişim Tarihi: 20.02.2022
Lorey, I. (2015). State of insecurity: Government of the precarious (A. Derieg, Cev.). Verso.
Lorey, I. (2016). Kirilganlarin yonetimi (N. Koklu, Cev.). Otonom Yayinlari.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2017). Komunist manifesto. Yordam Kitap.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370-396.
Morgan, D. L. & Morgan, R. K. (2008). Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. SAGE Publications.
Oguz, S. (2011). Tekel direnisinin isiginda guvencesiz calisma/yasama: Proletaryadan "Prekarya" ya mi?. Mulkiye Dergisi, 35(271), 7-24.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel arastirma ve degerlendirme yontemleri, (Ceviri Ed: Butun, M. & Demir, S.B.). 2. Baskı. Pegem Akademi.
Ravenelle, A. J., Kowalski, K. C., & Janko, E. (2021). The side hustle safety net: Precarious workers and gig work during COVID-19. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 898-919.
Schelsky, H. (1954). The family in Germany. Marriage and Family Living, 16(4), 331-335.
Sennett, R. (2008), Karakter asinmasi. Yeni kapitalizmde isin kisilik uzerindeki etkileri. (B. Yildirim, Cev.). Ayrinti Yayinlari.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
Smith, A. (2010). The Wealth of Nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Harriman House Limited.
Sorokin, P. A. (1959). Social and cultural mobility. Free Press.
Standing, G. (2020). Prekarya: Yeni tehlikeli sinif, (E. Bulut, Cev.). İletisim.
Standing, G. (2017). Prekarya bildirgesi: Haklarin kisilmasindan yurttasliga (S. Cinar, & S, Demiralp, Cev.). İletisim.
Standing, G. (2018). The-precariat-todays’s transformative class?, Great Transition Initiative, https://greattransition.org/publication/precariat-transformative-class. Erişim Tarihi: 07.12 2021.
Sunar, L. (2018). Sosyal tabakalasma: Kavramlar, kuramlar ve temel meseleler. Nobel Akademik Yayincilik.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd Ed.). Sage.
Vatansever, A. (2013). Prekarya geceleri: 21. yuzyil dunyasinda gelecegi olmayan beyaz yakalilarin ruyasi. LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 1-20.
Weber, M. (2011). Toplumsal ve ekonomik orgutlenme kurami, O. Ozankaya (Cev.). Cem Yayinevi.
Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., Durach, C. F., & Humphreys, P. (2021). Exploring the performance implications of precarious work. Journal of Operations Management, 67(8), 926-963.
Yagan, E. & Ozgenel, M. (2021). Okullarda yabanci dil agirlikli siniflar araciligiyla kulturel sermaye artirimi ve egitimsel esitsizlik uzerine nitel bir arastirma. Marmara Universitesi Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 54, 289-312. https://dx.doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.929651
Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Seckin Yayincilik.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
